I wonder if there's a way to determine why fake ears were, and maybe had to be used on these Beatles. It would be one thing if they were always the same and they were trying to make every Paul look like each other, but some have attached lobes and some have detached lobes. Why wouldn't they want them to be identical if the reason for the fakeness was to fool us and make us think it's the same person? Human doubles could also not have the same look as Paul McCartney, and each and every time have the same lower left eye, flared left nostril, and teeth pattern, except when those things are reversed to the other side of his face, which is an indication and hallmark sign of cloning.
I have to wonder if the reason for fake ears is because they were 'add ons', because whatever the Beatles were fashioned from - if they were not true humans in the sense that we know - maybe they did not have real ears. Reptiles, birds, etc. do not have ear 'cuffs', just the openings in the head. When you look at the picture of John's corpse in the morgue, there are only 'openings' on the side of his head, but no ears. Why? Where did they go? Then later, the ears are back in other pictures. How?
What can we find out about all this? Also, why other fake facial parts, as well as what seems to be missing body parts?
Brianmurray commented at CTRN (original forum 2011):
Maybe or it is pure misdirection, meant to confuse any attempt to think of the real Paul at all.
We keep going back to pre 1964 Paul photos for the real Paul. What makes us think any of those are untampered photos.
I think they were props from the beginning. Photos were preconceived from the start.
Maybe the Beatles were the very first fully contrived entertainment act, from conception to death .
They were in on the secret of the ancient mystics and they were presenting the passion play that is called by illuminist freemasons , the " great work".
Telling the story of Alice in wonderland.
The philosophers stone .