This may be the longest thread of all the tutorials because there is so much ground to cover in so many directions.
The Film Help!
Yes, I can see that some of his hair is curling up over the edge of his ear, but it looks like the part next to his face is way too loose.
The Beach Scene from Help!
If not fake, then the lobes are very detached, and it has been shown that is not always the case.Compare with attached lobe in 1965, and sitting further back behind the jawline (although one is attached and the other detached).
Here's a comparison of Paul in 1964 and 1967 - with the same ears - which are ATTACHED, and identical eyebrows. If he was killed and replaced, how does he show up again identically like this, when he had so many different ears during Beatlemania? If there was only one Paul through all the years who had attached earlobes, how did he have DE-tached lobes in the previous pictures?
This only leaves room for MULTIPLES. All the way through the Beatles' career.
Here we see the identical ears and brows in 1965 and 1967. Many people want to say the photos are doctored. Okay, fair enough; we've come across doctored photos plenty of times, and have noted them as such. If that's the case here or in the previous comparison, please point out how and where. It isn't that difficult to do with the abundance of detection software now available.
1965 on the Ed Sullivan Show. What a fake ear failure! Why does he suddenly have such a leathery look to his skin, and why is his head suddenly so much smaller. And someone has pointed out to me how overly white his ears are, compared to his face.
Isn't this an incredibly-indented earlobe with quite a bit of rippling?
Notice the airbrushing in front of Paul's ear here? There are more pictures like this which I will show in due time. At least he has the 'mandatory' chin cleft that's supposed to show he's the 'real' Paul, which most of them don't have! I suppose that was airbrushed, too?