The Beatles Never Existed


A Journey of Multiples

Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Postby Silversong » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:33 am

Here's what might be a very quick and easy way for those with an open mind who are doing further research on the Beatles to see there were many different Pauls in the early years.

Here they are in a larger formatting, but the viewer will probably have to scroll to view all of them. But this is not to say that these 12 pictures constitute the entirety of the Paul McCartney multiples.

Notice different eyebrows, varying degrees of a lower left eye, different higher nostril, as well as other differing features.
Image
Image

Here they are in a smaller formatting, so the viewer can see them all at once, but the details and differences are harder to spot.
Image
Image

Here's all 12 at once, but the pictures are smaller.
Image

This can also be viewed on a wider screen at the website in order to better see the detail:
http://www.thebeatlesneverexisted.com/B ... omp1a.html
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in service to others. Mahatma Gandhi
Silversong
Banned On The Run
Banned On The Run
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:50 am

Re: Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Postby Silversong » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:34 am

The years of these two photos are debatable among different people, but they are definitely between 1963 and 1965. Here's what isn't debatable:

Image

There is probably a far better chance of people reading the text for this if it's actually part of the picture. You will now notice what I mean about having a different higher nostril in some pictures, just like different eyebrows and earlobes. If we could also see their heights and body types, well, what is left to say? (The Beatles Never Existed!)
Image

Reducing Paul on the right still yields larger irises than Paul on the left.
Image

Again with a reduction in Paul on the right, the eyes will match as to horizontal distance, but nothing else lines up.
Image

Here it is shown that the nose and mouth don't match.
Image

And this includes the eyes as non-matching, along with nose and mouth.
Image

Another way to look at it.
Image

Reversing sides.
Image
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in service to others. Mahatma Gandhi
Silversong
Banned On The Run
Banned On The Run
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:50 am

Re: Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Postby Silversong » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:35 am

I took three more younger Pauls at random for comparison. All have different eyebrows and ears/ ear placements, noses, etc.
Image

Choosing two for a half-and-half comparison.
Image

Three more. Notice the much lower eye in the middle picture, and how much more of a downward curve it has compared to the other two pictures.
Image
Image
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in service to others. Mahatma Gandhi
Silversong
Banned On The Run
Banned On The Run
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:50 am

Re: Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Postby Silversong » Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:36 am

I've taken a few photos of Beatlemania Paul that I've split in half vertically, then matched randomly to see if they would go together well. These are the ones that matched perfectly, but it took an extremely long time and much tedious re-cropping, re-sizing and re-positioning to make them come out the same. I did everything short of doctoring the photos, which I've never done and will never do. And yet with all of that, I've only been able to come up with these two sets so far.
Image

Image

These are the ones that don't go well together at all. I tried every bit as hard to make these match, short of doctoring them, but they just don't.
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Now it can be more easily explained and understood how pictures of any pre-67 Paul can be put together with a post-66 Paul that matches, and come out well -- as most of us have seen by now in videos and on blogs -- such as these that I've put together myself.
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

And also how pictures of any pre-67 Paul can be put together with a post-66 Paul that doesn't match, and come out strangely -- again, as we've seen in videos and on blogs -- such as these I've put together myself.
Image

Image

Image

Image

It's because there were always multiple Pauls, from the beginning... they can be matched or miss-matched to suit any purpose or theory, whether people know that's what they're doing or not. If someone wants to accuse the photos of being doctored, or the characters of having surgery, we need to see the evidence for these things. It's not enough to just 'say' so, in order for it to fit a certain belief. Even if one or two are doctored here or there, and someone had surgery, why don't they all match? They look different instead of identical, so how could any tampering be happening?

And a match:
Image
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in service to others. Mahatma Gandhi
Silversong
Banned On The Run
Banned On The Run
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:50 am

Re: Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Postby Silversong » Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:01 am

Our moderator at FFD posted this recently:

Another rare scar appearance. Up on his left jaw/cheek area. Narrow and upright.
As opposed to the large square one he has lower on his jaw in the concert scene during AHDN.


I took some screen shots. Here's a good close-up of the scar.
Image

This is a very different ear from all the others we've posted on the fake ear thread. And obviously fake sideburns, as well as a separate wig in the front?
Image
Image
Image

Chin scar, too.
Image

He strums with his fingers instead of using a pick. Isn't that supposed to mean it's "Faul"?
Image

He has a severely lower left eye and ear, like these other two. They also all seem to have that fine, small tip to their nose, unlike some of the other Pauls before, during and after PID.
Image
Image

Is this another fake ear?
Image

Comparison of ears. Does the third one look like it has a noticeable seam? See close-up in second row.
Image
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in service to others. Mahatma Gandhi
Silversong
Banned On The Run
Banned On The Run
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:50 am

Re: Quick-Glance "Different Beatlemania Pauls"

Postby Silversong » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:07 pm

I'm working on more about this, but in the meantime, I noticed how strangely the lighting makes his eye look at this angle.
Image

Just one second later as he changes position, that goes away, but there's a strange black line in his right eye which doesn't go away for the duration of the video. Is it possibly a contact lens that's too large or has slipped out of position? I think that's what it is, based on the two different colors in that eye. So it appears he was wearing colored lenses to make his eye color darker.
Image

PIDers say the "real" JPM's eyes were brown or hazel. I've posted pictures on different threads of green-, brown- and blue-eyed Pauls.
The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in service to others. Mahatma Gandhi
Silversong
Banned On The Run
Banned On The Run
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:50 am


Return to Paul "Multiples"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest